GRE

Comments

Living in a VERY small college town, it was a huge issue going to take my two Praxis tests. I had a 1hour and 10minute drive both ways, through the mountains. And of course, it was winter. (so the trip actually took longer) The test starts at 8am on a Saturday. As a winter/spring athlete -- I only had one free Saturday, so I had to get special permission from two coaches to miss a track meet for my second test.

A long way of saying: I am not sure if it would have completely dissuaded me from applying, but it would have made my life a whole lot more difficult, and certainly would probably stop some people from applying. (For example, if my coach had said, "Well, you can miss one meet, but not two.")
I'd have to agree with Anna. It's difficult for some people in remote areas to get to the test, and with both Praxis tests required, it's also a bit of money as well.

I'd already taken the GRE though: people who are applying to other things may be in the same boat.
Three tests is a pain in the ass, but a high percentage of serious applicants are going to have taken the GRE anyway, or will be planning on it, or thinking about it.
I had taken it anyway, but I think it might cost a few applications. It would be a pain in the ass during a busy time for some people, and really I think it's pretty irrelevant. You get a better judgement of someone's intelligence and knowledge from their transcript anyway. Can you ever really envision the GRE score as being a deciding factor in admissions for MTC? I kind of doubt it.

I disagree with the previous comment. Grades are a reflection of self-discipline and consistency, not necessarily intelligence or even retained knowledge. Many of the smartest students have spotty grades, and the highest GPA's are generally overachievers, not the smartest students. Because most grading policies deliberately reward effort and consistency as a sort of mercy policy and behavior reinforcement, stand-alone tests and exams are a truer measure of intellect and accumulated knowledge. Maybe you still prefer grades as a predictor of future success, but at least be honest about what they are measuring.

Regarding the original question, my answer is a great big NOT SURE. Other comparable teaching programs such as TFA and NYCTF do not require the GRE, so it is a significant discouragement. As Ms. M and others point out, it often is not convenient in terms of timing and location for many of us to take the tests within a certain timeframe. I felt the same way about the PRAXIS exams; it was a four-hour (onw-way) drive for the Praxis1 for me!

the highest GPA's are generally overachievers, not the smartest students.

This brings us back to THE eternal question... what makes a good teacher? I would argue overachievers generally make better teachers than the smartest ones, but ... who knows.
But most (I would imagine virtually all) master's degree programs require the GRE...
I agree with this. If GPA is a better indicator of self-discipline and work ethic, I think these two qualities are much more important than raw intelligence. I think that of all the qualities an effective teacher needs (organizational ability, "teacher" persona, and content knowledge), content knowledge is the least important. It's important, but other things are more important...

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in